New gameplay rollers from the closed alpha were sprinkled into the network Battlefield 1. All sorts of famous streamers and “YouTube” participated in the testing. Thanks to them, they managed to find out several important details about the upcoming shooter Dice.
For example, Westie user assures that he talked directly with the developers and confirmed some details. Firstly, Battlefield 1 From the very release will support servers with an increased frequency of update. On PC, the minimum "tikrat" will be 60 hertz. The authors will try to put the same bar on consoles, but there are difficulties with platform holders there.
Secondly, c Battlefield 1 you can not quickly destroy the tanks. As Westie says, there were rumors in the community that you could brave, open the hatch and throw a grenade into a strange tank. Sounds, of course, cool, but nothing like that Battlefield 1 It won’t.
Thirdly, the weather affects the glare from the sights. That is, in the rain and fog, snipers will be able to arrange stealth disassembly. True, enemies with rifles are still allowed to note that a marker hung over their heads: the so-called “3D-spotting” will return to Battlefield 1. But there will be no passive marks, you must definitely look at the enemy and press a separate button.
Fourthly, c Battlefield 1 really there is no weapon that is suitable for several classes: each type of fighters has its own unique calculation.
Other fresh gameplay videos from Battlefield 1 You can also see here, here or here.
June 27, 2016 Torbjorn from Overwatch will make weaker on consoles, but not on PC
June 27, 2016 Street Fighter V: June https://play-jango.co.uk/bonus/ update in July and the trailer of the new character
Battlefield 1
The best comments
The more the details of the BF1 are revealed. The more I am assured that this batthus is not 1 MW setting, but costumedly presented on the topic of it. With weapons "who brought what" and so on.Especially the emphasis on weapons, because Battla is a shooter like nothing. It is through weapons that the atmosphere of that war should be conveyed. Since through weapons we notice the difference in time framework. And then what? For the beginning, semi -automatic rifles were, if not a luxury, then for sure something special (I know about ABC36 and guarantee, but most fought with conventional rifles). Here (as I understand it) are completely self -loading, PP and hand machine guns. If with the "native" weapons of that war a boring gameplay, then it is asked why it was to climb this time period.
I don’t argue an interesting game. But as a person, I would like a little about that war precisely the “that war”, and not the “alternative”.
20 year -old experts, experts and historians of 1MV gathered in the comments. Right now they will begin to explain for realism in the battles.
All the same battla, side view. As a result, only the appearance remained from the First World War, all the same soldiers with machine guns are briskly rushed across the field, all the markers over the heads of enemies will still be over the heads of. But instead of airships, there could be a titanium, according to which one could walk and blow him up, and he would have fallen no less spectacularly. and Frostbeita destruction would look more beautiful in cities. And again they will ask 5k per game with the premium pass.
T.e., You want a gameplay reduced to an hourly seat in the trench? OKAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAY
And yes, read about the watering of the PMV. And be surprised.
I don’t remember the ballistics in the code as such, in the BF she, in fact, a la arm, olives have speed and falls on the parabola, and even to some extent it is more difficult to be a sniper in the BF, since the speed of the bullets is artificially understated from the real ones, and the drop begins earlier, but this is the stump of the stump of the distance of the battles, so that the guns are not felt by the laser as in the same code.
“What are you! After all, everyone got the shooters about the future! Everyone was tired of exoskeletons and walking robots, and if you are not, you are wrong and shit!11 ".
I have once burned on this, having painted the reasons for the dislike for announcement 1 buttlefield and expressing a desire to finally see the development of the series in the direction of 2143, given that now in 2142 it is just impossible to play, because the Gamespy is dead.
As a result, he was driven into such disadvantages that only thanks to the reforms on the site was able to return the rating. Mainstream dictates the rules, thyroid.
You have to go to the Verden to play and not the bat. Batla is not about realism, but spectacular dynamic mass battles in certain decorations. And with realism, everyone will begin to whine that BF1 is played slowly and boring. See how many people play a Verden or Red Orchestra and how much in BF4 is running.
If she looks like that, I say that. Well, we have a little different experience in BF. I started with Battlefield 1942 and worry about the series. I didn’t even start nervous =)
Show with your finger where exactly I said that Bf3 = BF4. No need to see some kind of ephemeral game community in my face, and even more so to say as if I expressed his thoughts. Initially, it was clear that BF4 was a huge step forward. As soon as they showed a video of a single mission in Baku in general everything became clear. You remember this screen when you look around the construction site, t.h. I could not physically say that. At the same time, as a gameplay with a grip of points may vary? No way! Only setting and features can differ, which in the video for 10 minutes are actually very poorly shown. This is an indisputable fact.
It hurts me BF1 reminded the BF4 in the setting of the First World War, while without special changes to the side of the gameplayers, which indicated the historical time period, at least this video was not at all. Replace the uniform with modern and weapons and you can confuse with addition to BF4, with a new card, and even leave and looks like a high -quality fan mod to 4. Everyone remembers how the parties to the conflict in the First World War loved to use gas, and quite massive. In the game, a gas attack that could become an interesting feature, in fact, resembles a zilch from a spray can with dichlophos on a burning lighter. By the way, it would be cool if they realized in the game in a gas attack, when you do a quick murder from a close distance with a knife, but pulling the gas mask and hold the enemy for several seconds so that he breathes pairs.
Grafonio, there is no effect, but it looks beautiful. The backs were generally impressed. In the arcade plan, everything looks cheerful and fun, as is the case in shooters from Dice. I liked the explosions. Many unsubscribing here, they say: First World War in a solitary campaign. That’s where it will be, everything is beautiful and cool. Only everyone who remembers that we were promised in BF4, quite coolly reacted to the promises of developers about a single campaign.
The manner of communication is changed. Something begins to strain this derogatory manner of writing from adolescents Runet. They communicate normally with you, as with equal. No need to write in the style and you “do not grind” Vasya ”here. I was also 20 years old and I also believed that the opinion with which I did not agree is complete nonsense. Now I’m already trying to understand him. Answering your question, apparently you preferred not to read my first sentence from the very first post, but for some reason you want me to pay attention to your phrases. It was not for nothing that I added after the comma that I was out of this video, and not in general from the total volume of media files by BF1. My main criticism, by the way, was not that BF1 was similar to BF4, but that the setting and gameplay features were disclosed very weakly, as an example used a gas attack. To make understanding, on the contrary, I want to make mistakes and I want Bf1 to become a revelation for us all and it seems to me a little wild that you and others somehow mentally told yourself. Well, they did not take a step forward, but, they developed a little of their cool developments, removing the bad. As soon as you stop taking a step forward, you turn a series into COD or AC. The series degrades and becomes monotonous and conditional drunk_master will already write about it in a derogatory form as a certain bad constant Gamdev, which changes only in the minds of marketers and publishers, and de facto stands in place and will be absolutely right. I do not want us to receive Pyosik Riley first, then a useless nanocostom, only on the FB engine, like New Game Expirants. The topic is fertile+a rollback attempt from Modern Warfare, which is already tired of many, but ..
DOOOO, ballistics as zero shooters and code only help this. Also the presence of a sufficiently large amount of armored transport, aviation, etc
You can, please, Pruf, which says that BF1 is a "historically reliable masterpiece"? Or from the sofa and so you can see?
Dudes, this is a computer game. Entertainment, all things. Why talk about reliability? Why do you need realism? Well, yes, the guns are not the same. Yes, it would be cool Battlefield 2142 instead. If you want realism – welcome to the contract service "where" where ". There is BF2 PR, Verdun, Squad and Insurgency for the extreme. I personally have enough squad with my head. Mir to you.
Leave a Reply